本文二维码信息
二维码(扫一下试试看!)
A HAZOP-LOPA-based Design Method for Safety Instrumented Systems in the Recovery Combustion Section of Alkali Recycling Processes
Received:July 02, 2025  Revised:July 23, 2025
DOI:10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2026.01.019
Key Words:alkali recovery combustion section  HAZOP-LOPA  safety integrity level  safety instrument system  risk quantification
Fund Project:国家自然科学基金(62073206);西安市科技计划项目(2020KJRC0146)。
Author NameAffiliationPostcode
TANG Wei* College of Electrical and Control Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, 710021
Shaanxi Xiwei Process Automation Engineering Co., Ltd., Xianyang, Shaanxi Province,712000 
712000
ZHENG Xiaohu* College of Electrical and Control Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, 710021 710021
WANG Mengxiao Shaanxi Xiwei Process Automation Engineering Co., Ltd., Xianyang, Shaanxi Province,712000 712000
WANG Qilin Shaanxi Xiwei Process Automation Engineering Co., Ltd., Xianyang, Shaanxi Province,712000 712000
Hits: 2397
Download times: 446
Abstract:In response to the problems of fragmented risk analysis and insufficient quantitative evaluation in the current design methods of safety instrumented systems (SIS) in the paper industry, this paper took the SIS design of the steam drum control part in the alkali recovery combustion section as an example and proposed a SIS grading and design method based on hazard and operability analysis-layer of protection analysis (HAZOP-LOPA). Firstly, the process noded of the alkali recovery combustion section were divided, and a corresponding two-dimensional risk matrix of risk probability consequence was designed. The potential deviations and risk scenarios of this section were systematically identified through the HAZOP method, and an independent protection layer quantification model was constructed by combining LOPA. Then, based on the risk transmission characteristics, a layer of protection analysis-safety integrity level (LOPA-SIL) dynamic mapping relationship was established to reasonably classify the level of the SIL. Finally, the SIL was designed according to the classification results, and the effectiveness of the system was verified through indicators such as system failure probability and residual risk value. The results showed that this method could successfully identify two high-risk scenarios and determine the need to add SIS of SIL2. After improvement, the risk probability was successfully reduced to an acceptable level for the enterprise (<1.0×10-6/year).
View Full Text  HTML  View/Add Comment  Download reader