<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005">
<channel xmlns:cfi="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005/internal" cfi:lastdownloaderror="None">
<title cf:type="text"><![CDATA[ -->Policy and Macro-strategic Analysis]]></title>
<item>
<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text"><![CDATA[A Quantitative Analysis of the Evolutionary Characteristics of Environmental Policies in China’s Paper Industry: Based on Policy Documents from 1990 to 2023]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://zgzz.ijournals.cn/zgzzen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=202502005&flag=1]]></link>
<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html"><![CDATA[This study systematically collected environmental policy documents issued by the government for the paper industries from 1990 to 2023. By applying bibliometric and content analysis methods， this paper quantitatively analyzed the changes in environmental policies for China’s paper industries across different periods， aiming to uncover trends in policy evolution and development. The findings indicated that from 1990 to 2023， the number of regulatory and guidance policies in the paper industries had increased across all periods， reflecting the government’s growing focus on the sector’s environmental impact and its promotion of technological advancement. There was a trend toward diversification of policy issuers， indicating an increasing role of interdepartmental collaboration in policy formulation. Policy content had evolved from raising environmental awareness and encouraging technological improvements to enforcing stringent environmental standards and regulations， and ultimately advancing towards green， low-carbon， and circular economy goals. This progression illustrated a shift from isolated pollution control to a comprehensive sustainable development pathway.]]></description>
<pubDate>2025/2/25 13:04:27</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Policy and Macro-strategic Analysis]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[DU Zhaochuan,MA Furong,YU Chang]]></author>
<atom:author xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<atom:name>DU Zhaochuan,MA Furong,YU Chang</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<guid><![CDATA[http://zgzz.ijournals.cn/zgzzen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=202502005&flag=1]]></guid><cfi:id>2</cfi:id><cfi:read>true</cfi:read></item>
<item>
<title xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="text"><![CDATA[Ecological Efficiency Measurement of Five Paper Making Countries Based on Super-Efficiency SBM-ML Model]]></title>
<link><![CDATA[http://zgzz.ijournals.cn/zgzzen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=202502006&flag=1]]></link>
<description xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" cf:type="html"><![CDATA[In the context of global climate change， the efficiency of resource and environmental utilization in the pulp and paper industry urgently needs to be improved. Based on the panel data from 2010 to 2019 of the top five papermaking countries—the united states， China， Japan， Brazil， and Canada， this study measured the ecological efficiency of the pulp and paper industries using the super-efficiency Slack-Based Measure （SBM） model that incorporated undesirable outputs. The Malmquist-Luenberger （ML） index model was employed to explore its temporal variation characteristics. The results showed that significant variations in ecological efficiency among these countries， each exhibiting distinct evolutionary patterns： the average ecological efficiency over ten years for the United States， Japan， Brazil， Canada， and China was 0.932 7， 0.895 1， 0.754 1， 0.485 3， and 0.346 2， respectively. The United States’ pulp and paper industries showed a fluctuating upward “W” shaped trend， while China’s demonstrated a year-by-year increasing trend， Japan and Brazil’s papermaking industries displayed a downward and then upward trend， Canada’s pulp and paper industries experienced declining followed by a stable trend year by year. The variations in ecological efficiency among these countries’ pulp and paper industries were influenced by efficiency improvements and technological advancements in different manners： the ML index of ecological efficiency in the pulp and paper industries of the United States， Japan， Brazil， and Canada was more significantly impacted by the Technology Change （TC） index， whereas China’s was more influenced by the Efficiency Change （EC） index. On the one hand， resource utilization and management significantly affected ecological efficiency levels， while on the other hand， policies and markets exerted immense and sustainable impacts. Finally， suggestions for the future development of the pulp and paper industry were proposed in terms of technological innovation， resource utilization management， and pollutant prevention and control.]]></description>
<pubDate>2025/2/25 13:04:28</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Policy and Macro-strategic Analysis]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[LIU Shasha,QIAO Yuanbo,XIE Yunsheng,DENG Huijing]]></author>
<atom:author xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<atom:name>LIU Shasha,QIAO Yuanbo,XIE Yunsheng,DENG Huijing</atom:name>
</atom:author>
<guid><![CDATA[http://zgzz.ijournals.cn/zgzzen/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=202502006&flag=1]]></guid><cfi:id>1</cfi:id><cfi:read>true</cfi:read></item>
</channel>
</rss>